ACT v SA Telechess Match


21 April 1996



ACT v SA Telechess Match
========================
By and large chess players are a fairly polite lot. Well behaved,
sensible, and generally courteous. At least club chess players.
But there is one thing guaranteed to turn a group of mild, calm,
intelligent players into a pack of baying, snarling, lunatics:
The Telechess Match.
And if you read on you will see how this transformation takes place.

For the last few years the Australian Chess Federation (ACF) has organised
an interstate series. Due to the distances needed to be travelled within
Australia the matches are played via telephone. The ACT had played
Western Australia last year and had lost 10-5. This wasn't a bad
result given the relative strengths of the 2 sides and we were
interested in how we would go this year. 
In the first round ACT thought they were playing South Australia
and attempts were made to pick a team and organise a match. A date
was agreed upon and both teams got organised. Then the first problem
arose. The ACF released a draw that didn't include South Australia.
The ACF said they had forgotten to enter. This didn't deter the 
ACT Chess Association. They ignored the ACF and went ahead with
the match anyway.
The second problem was team selection. The task of organising a team
fell to the ACTCA Secretary, Jenny Moylan. It was decided that
the team would be picked in rating order. Unfortunately the net
wasn't cast very wide and a number of players who would have got
in on rating were not contacted. In fact a number of players expressed
suprise when told a telechess match was on at all. After a number
of players who were overlooked complained to the ACTCA it was decided
that the team would consist of the 10 highest rated players who
turned up on the day. As this decision was made 2 days before the
match a number of players who hadn't been contacted assumed they
hadn't been picked and didn't turn up.
The third problem was one of venue. With a week to go this hadn't
been organised. Fortunately the newly formed ANU Chess Club was able
to provide a venue and facilities for conducting the match.
As the players assembled on the morning of the match a new and
major problem arose. To save time and costs the match was to
be held over the Internet. The South Australians even offered
to provide the chess server (ICON). There were a couple of
problems with this. ICON ran on the South Australian Education
Department's NEXUS computer network. This is a pay for use
server. The organisers at the SA end wanted to use the match
to publicise the ICON system. The drawback was that unless you
had a registered account on NEXUS you couldn't view the match.
But this was a minor quibble. The major problem was that the
ICON server kept kicking us off after 2 minutes of inactivity.
So if a player was having a long think, or waiting for a reply
from his opponent he was likely to be logged out. Some would
see this as a cost saving measure (hung terminal etc) but you
were only sent back to the NEXUS system where connection costs
were still being accrued. As I ruefully noted to the South
Australians, "This wouldn't have happened on the Free Internet
Chess Server (FICS)". So the planned for advertising benefit
of the match for South Australia didn't eventuate.
After much stuffing around the match finally started using
a straight messaging system between the ACT and SA. Although
slower than the phone it had the benefit of being cheaper.

The ACT team were very much the underdog in this match. We were
outrated by 130 points per board. Winning the match was an
unlikely occurance.
One of the problems with Telechess is the time taken to transmit
moves. The process is as follows. Player makes move and presses
clock. The runner for the board (if paying attention) would
write down the move and take the scoresheet to the operator.
The operator would transmit the move to the operator at the
other end. He would write down the move on a scoresheet and would
pass the move onto the runner (if paying attention) who would
take it to the board and play the move. This process would take
about 2 minutes per move. So even with the timelimit at 40 moves
in 80 minutes it would still take about 5 and a half hours
to reach the first time control. And thats if nothing went wrong.
The sitting round, doing nothing part of the match produces
a kind of mass hysteria in the team. Because you have nothing
to do you talk to other team mates, discuss games, and
complain about things. And when something goes wrong you
become suspicious.
Early on in the Board 3 game the SA played the wrong move on
their board. A few moves later WGM Daniella Nutu-Gajic took
a pawn that she thought was undefended, and it appeared so
on her board. In fact here in Canberra she had just blown
a piece. When the move Bf3xe4 was sent back to SA there was
probably some confusion. After it was sorted out the game was
restarted at the point were the SA error was made. Soon after
a player (NOT Board 3 by the way) came up to me and said: "Thats
not fair, she just blew a piece". "It was an honest mistake, they
played the wrong move three moves back" I replied. "Sure, sure.
How do we know she didn't really just drop a piece". This was
too much for me. "We are playing a team that outrates us by a 
zillion points. Do you seriously think that the only way that
they can beat us is by cheating? Get real" And that ended that
conversation. However unfounded suspicions were still being
harboured by some of the more unstable members of out team.
Due to the delay in transmitting moves time scrambles became an
interesting sight. Even if you were in desperate time trouble you
would still have to wait 4-5 minutes between each move. This
meant that you had no sense of "flow" in the position. And checking
your opponents time also caused problems.
In the board 5 game both players got into time trouble at about
move 20. Times are exchanged every 10 moves but ocassionaly
players requested a time check on other occasions. This
eventually led to problems as the following shows

ACT: "Can we have a time check on board 5"
SA: No response
Moves from other games are relayed back and forth
Later
ACT: "Can we have a time check on board 5"
SA: Still no response
More moves are relayed, including moves for Board 5
Our Board 5 loses his temper and refuses to accept the
next SA move without a time check
ACT: "CAN WE HAVE A TIME CHECK ON BOARD 5"
SA: No response
Moves are still being sent back and forth. Suddenly
SA: "Time check on Board 5 please"
ACT: "Tell us your time first"
This gets misinterperated as a hostile response (Sort of like
The Prisoners Dillemma problem)
Civility between the operators goes downhill from here.

Later on another exchange occurs
ACT: "Time check on Board 13"
SA: "Board 13 refuses to exchange times"
I can just imagine the SA room. Fists being waved in the
air, shouts of "We'll show those bastards" etc etc
Later
SA: "Board 13 offers draw"
ACT: "Board 13 says 'GET BENT'"
Still later
SA: "Board 13 would like to exchange times"
ACT: "Board 13 suggests he can 'Stick his clock...'"
Finally
SA: "Board 13 loses on time. He thanks his opponent for a
hard fought game"
ACT: "Board 13 says Thanks"

Another big problem was that some games would stall. We would
send a move over that wouldn't be noticed at the other end.
This meant that SA were still waiting for a reply to
move X (which had been sent) while we were expecting move X+1.
Fortunately we had arranged a system in which we could see
which games had been waiting for a reply for quite a while.
However this system wasn't perfect.

ACT: "Board 10 X...Ke8-f7"
Later
SA: "What was last move for Board 10?"
ACT: "Board 10 X...Ke8-f7"
Later
SA: "Still waiting for move X on Board 10"
ACT: "Board 10 X...Ke8-f7 and claims a draw by 3 fold repetition"

The whole match lasted from 11:30 am until 7:45 pm. The result
was much as expected with South Australia winning 10.5-4.5.
On the whole the ACT team fought hard (although one player
resigned because he wanted to have dinner) and we scored 3-3 on
the top six boards.
Congratulations to South Australia and I just hope I don't get
lynched next time I visit the South Australian Chess Centre.

Thanks go to: Dr Jeff Wood as match referee, the ANU Computer
Science Department for providing the venue and equipment, the
ANU Chess Club for providing logistical support, Tuggeranong and
Belconnen Chess Clubs for providing equipment, and David Blackman,
Mark Hummell, Peter Pullicino, Anthoney Wesley, Jenny and Clare
Moylan, Sam Killmier and anyone else I've forgotten for helping as runners.

Shaun Press


Results
=======

ACT				SA
==========================================================
1. Tim Reilly		1	Trevor Tao		0
2. Tristan Reeves	0	Alexander Davidovic	1
3. Peter Gmizic		0	Daniella Nutu-Gajic	1
4. Ian Rout		0	Mark Chapman		1
5. Milan Grcic		1	Alan Goldsmith		0
6. Stephen Bartlett	1	Bob Cowley		0
7. Geoff Butler		0	Neil Steffensen		1
8. Rory OBrien		0	Alex Sykes		1
9. Ian Hosking		0	Michael Hornung		1
10.Andrew Greenwood	0	Michael Hoff		1
11.Gunnars Lamberts	0	D. Hester		1
12.Gail Ransom		0	Ngan Koshnitsky		1
13.Simon Ayling		1	Oliver Oks		0
14.Duncan Gilmour	0	James Coventry		1
15.Laura Moylan		=	Jasmine Lauer-Smith	=
==========================================================
                       4.5                            10.5
==========================================================

Games from the match
White: Reilly, Tim
Black: Tao, Trevor
Place: ACT v SA Telechess  Board: 1  Year: 1996
1.d4 e6 2.c4 Nf6 3.Nc3 Bb4 4.e3 b6 5.Bd3 Bb7 6.Ne2 Bxg2
7.Rg1 Be4 8.a3 Bxc3+ 9.Nxc3 Bxd3 10.Qxd3 g6 11.e4 Nh5
12.Bg5 f6 13.Be3 Nc6 14.O-O-O Qe7 15.f4 Ng7 16.d5 Nd8 17.f5
Nf7 18.Nb5 O-O 19.fxg6 hxg6 20.Bd4 c5 21.Bc3 Ne5 22.Bxe5
fxe5 23.Rxg6 Rf6 24.Rg2 Raf8 25.Rdg1 R8f7 26.Nxa7 Rf2
27.Kb1 R7f3 28.Qd1 Rxg2 29.Rxg2 Qf6 30.Qd2 Rf4 31.Qe3 Qh4
32.Re2 Nh5 33.Nc8 Rf1+ 34.Ka2 exd5 35.cxd5 Nf4 36.Rc2 Rd1
37.Qg3+ Qxg3 38.hxg3 Nd3 39.Nxb6 Nc1+ 40.Rxc1 Rxc1 41.Nxd7
Kf7 42.Nxe5+ Ke7 43.Kb3 Re1 44.Nd3 Re3 45.Kc4 Rxe4+ 46.Kxc5
Kd7 47.b4 Re3 48.Kd4 Rxg3 49.Ne5+ Kc7 50.Nc4 
                           1-0    
White: Davidovic, Alexander
Black: Reeves, Tristan
Place: ACT v SA Telechess  Board: 2  Year: 1996
1.d4 e6 2.c4 Nf6 3.g3 Bb4+ 4.Bd2 Qe7 5.Bg2 Nc6 6.Nf3 Bxd2+
7.Nbxd2 a5 8.O-O d6 9.e4 e5 10.d5 Nb8 11.Ne1 O-O 12.Nd3 c6
13.Qe2 Re8 14.h3 Na6 15.Qe3 Nb4 16.Nxb4 axb4 17.Qb3 c5
18.a3 bxa3 19.Rxa3 Rxa3 20.Qxa3 Bd7 21.b4 cxb4 22.Qxb4 Rb8
23.Qb6 Ba4 24.Ra1 Nd7 25.Qc7 b5 26.Bf1 Qe8 27.Qxd6 Nf6
28.cxb5 Bxb5 29.Rb1 Rd8 30.Bxb5 Rxd6 31.Bxe8 Nxe8 32.Rb8
Kf8 33.Nc4 Ra6 34.d6 Ra1+ 35.Kg2 Rd1 36.Rd8 h6 37.d7 Rxd7
38.Rxd7 
                           1-0    
White: Gmizic, Peter
Black: Nutu-Gajic, Daniella
Place: ACT v SA Telechess  Board: 3  Year: 1996
1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 d6 3.d4 Nf6 4.Nc3 cxd4 5.Nxd4 Nc6 6.Be2 e5
7.Nb3 Be7 8.O-O O-O 9.Be3 a5 10.a4 Be6 11.Qd2 Nb4 12.Bf3
Rc8 13.Rfd1 Nd7 14.Rac1 Kh8 15.Nb5 Rxc2 16.Rxc2 Bxb3 17.Rc7
Bxa4 18.Rdc1 Bxb5 19.Rxb7 Ba6 20.Rbc7 Nc5 21.Bxc5 dxc5
22.Rd7 Qe8 23.Rd1 c4 24.Be2 Nd3 25.Ra7 Bb4 26.Qg5 Qe6
27.Qf5 Qxf5 28.exf5 Bb5 29.Bxd3 cxd3 30.b3 d2 
                           0-1    
White: Chapman, Mark
Black: Rout, Ian
Place: ACT v SA Telechess  Board: 4  Year: 1996
1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.b4 cxb4 4.d4 d5 5.exd5 Qxd5 6.c4 bxc3ep
7.Nxc3 Qa5 8.Bd2 e6 9.Bd3 Nf6 10.O-O Be7 11.Re1 O-O 12.Ne4
Qd8 13.Qc2 h6 14.Rad1 Nxe4 15.Bxe4 Nxd4 16.Nxd4 Qxd4 17.Bc3
Qc5 18.Bh7+ Kh8 19.Re5 Qc7 20.Rxe6 Qxc3 21.Qxc3 Bxe6 22.Bb1
Rfd8 23.Re1 Rac8 24.Qf3 b6 25.g3 Bf6 26.Qe4 g6 27.Qf3 Kg7
28.Rxe6 fxe6 29.Qb7+ Kh8 30.Qf7 Rd1+ 31.Kg2 Rxb1 32.Qxf6+
Kh7 33.Qf7+ Kh8 34.Qxg6 Re1 35.Qxh6+ Kg8 36.Qg6+ Kf8
37.Qf6+ Ke8 38.Qh8+ Kd7 39.Qg7+ Kc6 40.Qc3+ 
                           1-0    
White: Grcic, Milan
Black: Goldsmith, Alan
Place: ACT v SA Telechess  Board: 5  Year: 1996
1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.g3 h5 4.d3 Nf6 5.Bg2 d5 6.Nbd2 e5
7.exd5 Nxd5 8.Qe2 Qc7 9.Nc4 f6 10.c3 Be6 11.Nh4 O-O-O
12.Ng6 Bg4 13.f3 Bf5 14.Nxh8 Ndb4 15.cxb4 Bxd3 16.Qf2 Bxc4
17.Bf1 Qd7 18.Bd2 Nd4 19.Bc3 Bd5 20.Bxd4 cxd4 21.a3 g5
22.Bd3 Bh6 23.Ng6 g4 24.Bf5 Be6 25.Bxe6 Qxe6 26.Qc2+ Kb8
27.Rd1 gxf3 28.Qe4 Be3 29.Qxf3 e4 30.Qe2 f5 31.Nf4 Bxf4
32.gxf4 Qg6 33.Rd2 e3 34.Rd3 Qf6 35.Rg1 Rc8 36.Qxh5 Rc1+
37.Rd1 
                           1-0    
White: Cowley, Bob
Black: Bartlett, Steven
Place: ACT v SA Telechess  Board: 6  Year: 1996
1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.d4 cxd4 4.Nxd4 e5 5.Nb5 d6 6.N1c3 a6
7.Na3 b5 8.Nd5 Nge7 9.c4 Nd4 10.Be3 Nxd5 11.cxd5 Qb6
12.Bxd4 exd4 13.Nc2 Be7 14.Qxd4 Qxd4 15.Nxd4 Bf6 16.O-O-O
O-O 17.Nc2 Bg5+ 18.Kb1 f5 19.e5 dxe5 20.Be2 Bb7 21.f3 Rad8
22.Nb4 Rd6 23.Rd3 e4 24.fxe4 fxe4 25.Rd4 Bc8 26.Nc2 Rf2
27.Rxe4 Bf5 28.Bf3 Bxe4 29.Bxe4 Kf8 30.a3 Ke7 31.Rd1 Rd2
32.Re1 Kd8 33.Bf3 Rf6 34.Nb4 Kd7 35.Nxa6 Rxa6 36.Re4 Rd6
37.Rb4 R2xd5 38.Bxd5 Rxd5 39.h4 Bf6 40.Re4 Rd4 
                           0-1    
White: Butler, Geoff
Black: Steffensen, Neil
Place: ACT v SA Telechess  Board: 7  Year: 1996
1.c4 c6 2.d4 d5 3.cxd5 cxd5 4.Nf3 Nf6 5.Nc3 Bf5 6.e3 e6
7.Bd3 Bxd3 8.Qxd3 Nc6 9.a3 Be7 10.b4 O-O 11.O-O Rc8 12.Bb2
Bd6 13.Na4 Qe7 14.Nc5 b6 15.Nb3 Ne4 16.Rac1 f5 17.Ne5 Bxe5
18.dxe5 Qd7 19.h4 Qe7 20.g3 g5 21.hxg5 Qxg5 22.Kg2 Rc7
23.Rxc6 Rxc6 24.Nd4 Rfc8 25.Nxc6 Rxc6 26.Rh1 Qg7 27.Rc1
Rxc1 28.Bxc1 Qxe5 29.Qd4 Qxd4 30.exd4 Kf7 31.f3 Nc3 32.Bb2
Na4 33.Ba1 a6 34.b5 axb5 35.Kf2 f4 36.g4 Kf6 
                           0-1    
White: Sykes, Alex
Black: OBrien, Rory
Place: ACT v SA Telechess  Board: 8  Year: 1996
1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 g6 3.Nc3 Bg7 4.e4 O-O 5.Bg5 d6 6.f4 Na6 7.Nf3
c5 8.d5 Bg4 9.Bd3 Nd7 10.O-O Nc7 11.Qd2 Bxf3 12.Rxf3 a6
13.a4 b6 14.Raf1 Rb8 15.Kh1 Qe8 16.Rh3 f6 17.Bh4 Qf7
18.Rhf3 e6 19.dxe6 Nxe6 20.f5 Nd4 21.fxg6 hxg6 22.R3f2 Qe6
23.Nd5 g5 24.Bg3 Ne5 25.h3 Kh7 26.Qd1 Kh6 27.Be2 Nxe2
28.Qxe2 Nc6 29.Qd3 Nd4 30.Ne3 Rb7 31.Nf5+ Nxf5 32.exf5 Qf7
33.Re2 Rd8 34.Re6 d5 35.cxd5 Rbd7 36.d6 
                           1-0    
White: Hosking, Ian
Black: Hornung, Michael
Place: ACT v SA Telechess  Board: 9  Year: 1996
1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 e6 3.d4 cxd4 4.Nxd4 a6 5.c4 Nf6 6.Nc3 Bb4
7.Bd3 Qc7 8.O-O Bxc3 9.bxc3 d6 10.Bg5 Nfd7 11.f4 O-O 12.Qg4
Kh8 13.Rf3 Rg8 14.Rh3 Nf8 15.e5 f5 16.exf6ep g6 17.f5 gxf5
18.Qh5 Nc6 19.f7 Rxg5 20.Qxg5 Qxf7 21.Re1 Bd7 22.Ree3 Ne5
23.Be2 Nfg6 24.Rh6 Rg8 25.Reh3 Nf8 26.Qh4 Neg6 27.Bh5 Rg7
28.Bxg6 Nxg6 29.Qd8+ Nf8 30.Qb6 Qg8 31.Qxb7 e5 32.Ne2 f4
33.Qxa6 Rxg2+ 34.Kf1 Bxh3 35.Rxh3 Qg4 36.Qxd6 Qxe2+ 
                           0-1    
White: Hoff, Michael
Black: Greenwood, Andrew
Place: ACT v SA Telechess  Board: 10  Year: 1996
1.e4 c6 2.d4 d5 3.exd5 Qxd5 4.c4 Qa5+ 5.Nc3 Nf6 6.Bd3 Bg4
7.Ne2 e6 8.Qc2 Bd6 9.c5 Be7 10.O-O Nbd7 11.b4 Qc7 12.Bf4
Qc8 13.Ng3 Nd5 14.Nxd5 exd5 15.Rfe1 Be6 16.Nf5 Bf8 17.Nd6+
Bxd6 18.Bxd6 Nf8 19.f4 g6 20.a4 f5 21.Re2 Kf7 22.Rae1 Qd7
23.Bxf8 Rhxf8 24.Rxe6 Qxe6 25.Rxe6 Kxe6 26.b5 Rfe8 27.g4
fxg4 28.Qe2+ Kf7 29.Qxg4 Rad8 30.h4 Rg8 31.Kf2 h5 32.Qg5
Rde8 33.bxc6 bxc6 34.f5 gxf5 35.Qxf5+ Ke7 36.Qe5+ 
                           1-0    
White: Lamberts, Gunnars
Black: Hester, D
Place: ACT v SA Telechess  Board: 11  Year: 1996
1.d4 Nf6 2.Nf3 b6 3.e3 e6 4.Bd3 Bb7 5.Nbd2 d5 6.O-O Nbd7
7.c3 c5 8.Re1 Be7 9.e4 dxe4 10.Nxe4 O-O 11.Nxf6+ Nxf6
12.dxc5 bxc5 13.Bg5 h6 14.Bh4 Qb6 15.Qe2 Rfd8 16.b3 Qc6
17.Bb5 Qd5 18.Qe5 Qxe5 19.Nxe5 g5 20.Bg3 Rac8 21.f3 a6
22.Bf1 Nd5 23.Rac1 Bf6 24.c4 Nb4 25.a3 Nc6 26.Nxc6 Bxc6
27.Be5 Kg7 28.Bxf6+ Kxf6 29.Rcd1 a5 30.Kf2 Rb8 31.Rxd8 Rxd8
32.Re2 Rd1 33.Re1 Rxe1 34.Kxe1 Ke5 35.Ke2 Kd4 36.Kd2 e5
37.h3 f5 38.Bd3 e4 39.fxe4 fxe4 40.Bf1 e3+ 41.Ke2 Be4 42.b4
cxb4 
                           0-1    
White: Koshnitsky, Ngan
Black: Ransom, Gail
Place: ACT v SA Telechess  Board: 12  Year: 1996
1.d4 d5 2.Nf3 Nf6 3.b3 Bf5 4.Bb2 e6 5.e3 c5 6.Be2 Be7 7.O-O
O-O 8.c4 Nbd7 9.Nc3 dxc4 10.bxc4 Rc8 11.Qb3 Nb6 12.Rfd1 Qc7
13.Nb5 Qb8 14.dxc5 Bxc5 15.Be5 Qa8 16.Nc7 Rxc7 17.Bxc7 Qc8
18.Be5 Nbd7 19.Bb2 Bg4 20.h3 Bh5 21.Qc3 Bb6 22.Rac1 Nc5
23.Qe5 h6 24.g4 Bg6 25.Qf4 Bc7 26.Be5 Bxe5 27.Nxe5 b6
28.Bd3 Bxd3 29.Nxd3 Nce4 30.h4 Qc6 31.Ne5 Qb7 32.g5 hxg5
33.hxg5 Nh5 34.Qf3 g6 35.Rd7 
                           1-0    
White: Ayling, Simon
Black: Oks, Oliver
Place: ACT v SA Telechess  Board: 13  Year: 1996
1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 d6 3.d4 exd4 4.Nxd4 Nf6 5.Nc3 g6 6.f3 Bg7
7.Be3 O-O 8.Qd2 Re8 9.Bc4 a6 10.Be2 Nc6 11.h4 h5 12.O-O-O
Nxd4 13.Bxd4 b5 14.g4 hxg4 15.fxg4 b4 16.Nd5 Nxd5 17.Bxg7
Kxg7 18.Qxd5 Rb8 19.h5 gxh5 20.gxh5 Re5 21.Rdg1+ Kf8 22.Qd2
Qf6 23.h6 Be6 24.h7 Qh8 25.Qh6+ Ke7 26.Qg7 Rxe4 27.Qxh8
Rxh8 28.Bd3 Rg4 29.Rxg4 Bxg4 30.Rg1 f5 31.Rh1 Kf6 32.Kd2
Kg6 33.Rg1 Rxh7 34.Rxg4+ Kf6 35.Rxb4 Rh2+ 36.Kc3 Ke5
37.Bxa6 
                           1-0    
White: Coventry, James
Black: Gilmour, Duncan
Place: ACT v SA Telechess  Board: 14  Year: 1996
1.e4 g6 2.Nf3 Bg7 3.d3 d6 4.Nbd2 c5 5.g3 Nc6 6.Bg2 e6 7.O-O
Nge7 8.Re1 Bd7 9.Qe2 f5 10.exf5 Nxf5 11.c3 Rb8 12.Ne4 b5
13.g4 d5 14.Nxc5 Nfe7 15.Nxe6 Bxe6 16.Qxe6 Rc8 17.Ng5 Ne5
18.Rxe5 Bxe5 19.Qxe5 O-O 20.Ne6 Nc6 21.Qg7+ 
                           1-0    
White: Moylan, Laura
Black: Lauer-Smith, Jasmine
Place: ACT v SA Telechess  Board: 15  Year: 1996
1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 d6 3.d4 cxd4 4.Nxd4 Nf6 5.Nc3 a6 6.f4 e6
7.Be3 Nc6 8.Qf3 Qc7 9.g4 Nxd4 10.Bxd4 e5 11.fxe5 dxe5
12.Qg3 Bd6 13.Be3 Bb4 14.Bd2 Bxc3 15.Bxc3 Nxe4 16.Qxe5+
Qxe5 17.Bxe5 f6 18.Bd4 Ng5 19.Be2 Bd7 20.O-O-O Bc6 21.Rhe1
O-O-O 22.Bb6 Rxd1+ 23.Rxd1 Re8 24.h4 Ne6 25.Bd3 g6 26.Bc4
Bd7 27.Rf1 Rf8 28.Re1 Re8 29.Rf1 Rf8 
                           1/2    


Return to Australian Chess E-Zine